Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

The Access Initiative

Panama

TAI in Panama is led by Defensa Legal del Ambiente en Panamá . CIAM assisted in the development of the Environmental Democracy Index and joined TAI in 2014. 

 

 

2.02

Environmental Democracy Index Score

Panama scored well overall on the EDI legal indicators, with a very good score on the Transparency Pillar and good scores for the Participation and Justice pillars. For the Transparency pillar, the public has the right to request environmental information from the government, and access to information must be affordable. All relevant government agencies must make environmental information proactively available to the public. Regarding the Participation pillar, government agencies must account for public comments when making decisions that impact the environment, but have discretion whether to seek public input during the preparation of environmental regulations. As for the Justice pillar, the public can challenge a range of government decisions and appeal refusals to disclose information. However, there are no legal assistance mechanisms to remove societal and financial barriers so that the poor and marginalized can use courts to hold governments accountable. By addressing these issues, Panama could ensure that environmental information is made publicly available, public input is included in environmental rulemaking, and the public can effectively hold governments accountable for decisions that negatively impact the environment.

Visit the Environmental Democracy Index to explore the EDI score.

Related Contents