The Access Initiative

Menu

Topics: Network Activity

Booklet for Tracking Freedom of Information Requests by Communities – Guide to Request Information

Published: 2011

Freedom of Information Tracking

Complex monitoring templates including online systems have been used by civil society groups all over the world to monitor and track the results of Freedom of information requests. However communities often need a simple tool to record what has happened to their Freedom of information requests once sent to government agencies. Methods to track the date of their requests, any responses by government agencies , transfer of requests and options for appeal are all important. The Indonesian Center for Environmental Law in partnership with the World Resources Institute has developed a simple tool to help community members monitor their FOI requests. The booklet was created as part of the Strengthening the Right to Information to Improve public health and the environment project (SHRIMP – EQ) funded by the Open Society Foundation.

Rio +20: The 5Q Campaign         

Published: 2011

Twelve Responding Governments

Attached you will find a full write-up of the responses from the responding governments.

Governments who responded:

  • Argentina
  • Bolivia
  • Cameroon
  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
  • El Salvador
  • Gabon
  • Hungary
  • Ireland
  • Latvia
  • Madagascar
  • Mexico
  • Peru
  • Thailand
  • Venezuela

Governments contacted, no response:

  • Benin
  • Chile
  • Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
  • India
  • Jamaica
  • Macedonia
  • Malawi
  • South Africa
  • Sri Lanka

Citizen Enforcements of Procedural Rights in the Environmental Impact Assessment Process in Belize and Jamaica         

Published: 2011

The inclusion of procedural rights of access to information, public participationand access to justice in environmental decision-making are recognized in international treaties and soft law agreements as central to the sustainable development agenda. Since the 1990s, a number of Caribbean countries have enacted environmental legislation requiring the preparation of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) prior to permitting significant developments . The extent to which procedural rights have been included within EIA provisions however is varied. There has been little analysis of the impact of the use by citizens of procedural rights in these EIA processes.

This paper examines the legislative framework for EIAs and citizen enforcement of procedural rights in the decision-making process for proposed developments in Jamaica and Belize. The legislative frameworks adopted by Belize and Jamaica are significantly different; with the former enacting comparatively comprehensive regulations to guide the EIA process and the latter dependent on internal guidelines. In both countries there has been documented failure in law and practice to deliver effective procedural rights. A review of recent court decisions in Belize and Jamaica illustrates the value of citizen enforcement as a means of safeguarding procedural rights in the conduct and review of EIAs as well as demonstrating the failure in compliance.

ACCES A L’INFORMATION : CAS DE L’EXPLOITATION MINIERE DE Qit Madagascar Minerals (QMM) DANS LA REGION ANOSY (Fort Dauphin)

Published: 2011

Les industries minières sont considérées par le Gouvernement malagasy d’être des industries stratégiques pour le développement de Madagascar. Elles sont aussi sources d’impacts sociaux et environnementaux non négligeables. QIT Madagascar Minerals (QMM), détenue à hauteur de 80% par Rio Tinto et de 20% par l’Etat malgache représenté par l’Office des Mines National et des Industries Stratégiques (OMNIS), a mis en chantier une opération d’extraction de sables minéralisés, à Mandena, Taolagnaro dans la Région Anosy pour une durée de 20 à 25 ans. Le projet minier est localisé dans un environnement naturel très sensible avec un taux d’endémisme élevé et un écosystème littoral unique. L’étude de ce cas relatif à l’exploitation des sables minéraux (ilménite et zircon) à Fort-Dauphin se base alors sur les problématiques suivantes : y a-t-il une (des) initiative(s) du Gouvernement et de la compagnie minière pour l’accès du public à l’information sur le projet? Quelles sont les portées de celles-ci au niveau de la population ? L’objectif est d’identifier les lacunes juridiques, institutionnelles et les pratiques sur l’accès à l’information par rapport à l’environnement, la biodiversité et fournir des recommandations afin de combler ces lacunes.

Manual de acceso a la información y a la participación ambiental en Colombia          

Published: 2008

El objetivo de este folleto es facilitar la comprension del documento “Manual de acceso a la información y a la participación ambiental en Colombia”, destacando sus datos clave y proponiendo la realización de actividades que permitan la reflexión sobre los diferentes temas y aplicación práctica de la teoría. El manual pretende dar al lector un instrumento para el acceso a la información y participacón en asustos relacionados con el medio ambiente y los recursos naturales, los derechos y deberes relacionados con el tema y brindar y visión jurídica y social de lo relativo en materia ambientala nivel nacional e intenacional.

Advocacy Toolkit – TAI         

Published: 2010

Advocacy, for the TAI Network means turning our research into meaningful change on the ground. It is actively convincing others that our goal of widening access is worth implementing and ensuring that implementation is done well.

The Access Initiative (TAI) Advocacy Toolkit is a set of tools developed to help TAI partners strategically achieve reform and policy practice around access to information, public participation, and access to justice. Partners in Latin America contributed directly to the development of the toolkit in the regional meeting from 2009. Partners from Asia and Africa and attendees of the 2nd TAI Global Gathering contributed to the review of the tools over the course of their development. Partners used the toolkit successfully in Cameroon (FEDEV), Chile (PARTICIPA), India (LIFE), Ecuador (CEDA) Zimbabwe (ZELA). Partners from the 3rd Global Gathering in Uganda in 2010 have helped to refine and finalise proposals for this tool kit.

Access Improvements from 2005 to 2010

Published: 2010
Changes in Laws for 29 TAI partners

 

Attached, is a database of improvements in over 30 TAI Partner Countries. This database highlights changes in national laws towards access improvements from 2005 to 2010. The database highlights areas of change based on Access Pillars: Access to Information (A2I), Access to Justice (A2J), Public Participation(PP) and Capacity Building. Within the database, one can click on the link country tab to find the laws changes within each country.

Access Improvements from 2008 to 2010

Published: 2010

Attached, is a matrix of stories that have been written by TAI partners from October 2008 to July 2010 on access changes within their respective countries. The chart highlights the areas of change based on Access Pillars:Access to Information (A2I), Access to Justice (A2J), Public Participation (PP) and Capacity Building.

Within the chart, one can click on the link provided. This goes directly to a story or short blog post on this website explaining. The post provides first hand information from TAI partners working within that pillar of access.

Environmental Governance Indicators Toolkit (TAI Citizen’s Toolkit)

Published: 2008

The Access Initiative (TAI) Thailand, an environmental governance coalition has conducted three national assessments on environmental governance in Thailand in order to find ways to improve its environmental accountability. Having proposed by friends in the non-governmental organizations that a citizen’s toolkit of environmental governance should be made available for the interested public to be used as guidelines in considering the governance performance of projects conducted in their local areas, TAI Thailand then produced this toolkit.

This toolkit is therefore designed for the public to use as guidelines in considering the levels of good governance for projects (or planning or policy making) only. It is not meant for the public or any organizations to use to assess good governance, because the number of indicators gathered in this toolkit is only half of the indicators of the full version. Moreover, in conducting a complete assessment, it would have to follow procedures and involve many analysts/researchers. This toolkit can also be used by the government agencies as guidelines to enhance good governance in conducting the work of your agency.