The Access Initiative

East Kalimantan Community’s Struggles Underscore the Need for Proactive Transparency in Indonesia

By Carole Excell and Cait O’Donnell (Posted October 28, 2013) 

A special thanks to: Ariana Alisjahbana (WRI) for translating the many steps of JATAM’s right to information (RTI) request.

The Indonesian province of East Kalimantan has experienced a mining boom in the last decade. This boom has been decidedly pronounced in Samarinda, its capital, where more than 70% of the area has been allocated to mining concessions. Mining pits have been excavated near residential communities and then abandoned without reclamation and without proper environmental and safety control. As a result, two children were found dead in a mining pit in the outskirts of Samarinda, East Kalimantan in 2011.

JATAM (the Mining Advocacy Network), responded to these fatalities by using Indonesia Public Disclosure Act or Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) as an advocacy tool. JATAM is a network of non-governmental organizations and community-based organizations working on a number of interconnected issues including human rights, gender, the environment, indigenous peoples, and social justice in relation to the mining, oil, and gas industries. JATAM requested environmental impact assessments (EIA), also referred to as the AMDAL process in Indonesia, for all of the coal mining companies operating throughout East Kalimantan (approximately sixty).The organization hoped that obtaining these assessments—which they are legally guaranteed access to through FOIA —could shed light on local coal mines’ contaminants, the mitigation of impacts from mining activities, the monitoring of mining concessions, and other health and safety concerns.

JATAM embarked on their mission to obtain EIAs for every coal mining operation in January 2012. To date, they continue to work on fulfilling this mission. JATAM’s struggle makes it clear that while Indonesia may have a freedom of information law, actually obtaining the government-held information that directly impacts them is exceedingly difficult for the country’s citizens. Kahar Al Bahri, JATAM East Kalimantan’s Coordinator, describes the process of requesting environmental information under the Indonesia’s Freedom of Information law in an interview on YouTube.

1. JATAM initiated this process on January 12, 2012 by sending a letter to the Provincial Environment Agency in Samarinda, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. JATAM received no response. They sent and re-sent letters to the Provincial Environment Agency in Samarinda, the Environment Agency of East Kalimantan, and the Information Commission of East Kalimantan. Still, JATAM received no response. They filed a formal complaint with the mayor of Samarinda, who claimed that the information is private.

2. JATAM sent a formal complaint to the Information Commission of East Kalimantan, which agreed to mediate a meeting between JATAM and the Environment Agency of East Kalimantan. The Environment Agency, however, did not attend the first meeting. At the second meeting, the Environment Agency’s head denied the legitimacy of JATAM as an organization that could file a FOI request. Through the Information Commission’s mediation, the Environment Agency agreed to give JATAM the EIAs in one month.

3. Less than a month later, the Environment Agency claimed that the meeting did not follow the correct legal procedures and refused to comply with the decision. JATAM involved the local court system and, after several months, the court ruled that the Environment Agency had 8 days to comply with JATAM’s EIA request.

4. As of the date of the interview, The Environmental Agency is delaying the request and only issuing one EIA per week. The attached infographic outlines the timeline and the specifics of each step of JATAM’s EIA request.

The Need for Proactive Disclosure

As the process outlined above indicates, JATAM’s success in acquiring EIAs in East Kalimantan was hard-earned. The battle clearly provides justification for the call by advocates around the world that environmental information needs to be proactively available to members of the public without a request. Proactive Disclosure is the purposeful and anticipatory release of information to the public by government. Proactive Disclosure includes making information available to many potential requestors at once in a timely and efficient manner. In 2010, the International community adopted some specific guidelines in Bali, Indonesia, called the UNEP Bali Guidelines, on access to information, public participation and access to justice in the case of the environment, which recognize that: “Environmental information in the public domain should include, among other things, information about environmental quality, environmental impacts on health and factors that influence them, in addition to information about legislation and policy, and advice about how to obtain information.” Environmental Impact Assessments fall into the category of information in the “public domain” which should be made available without a request for information. This is because they facilitate an understanding of environmental impacts and monitoring of industry performance. However, in practice, as can be seen from the case of JATAM, these essential documents are not online, downloadable, or onsite in accessible forms.

Strengthening the Right to Information for People and the Environment

The Access Initiative (TAI) has been working in Indonesia with our partners Indonesian Center for Environmental Law (ICEL) and Wahana Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia (WAHLI) to promote proactive transparency and appropriate implementation of Indonesia’s Public Disclosure or FOIA Law. In a two year initiative called ”Strengthening Right to Information for People and the Environment” (STRIPE), we sought to empower communities in Indonesia to improve their environmental health through improved access to information on air and water quality in Serang and Jepara, Indonesia. The STRIPE project also pointed to the deficiencies in the FOI law and to the importance of increasing the capacity of government agencies to proactively release information. Obviously, there is still much work to be done, but it’s encouraging that a handful of dedicated groups are now endeavoring to bring to light the need for access to information. Through perseverance, groups like JATAM, ICEL, and WAHLI will continue to promote the proper implementation of FOI as an advocacy tool. But perhaps more importantly, they’ll push for the recognition that proactive transparency of environmental information is paramount. Proactive transparency will be discussed at the Open Government Partnership Summit in London this week on Civil Society Day. It is timely for the Indonesian government to consider this approach as it takes on the Presidency of the Open Government Partnership. Timely access to environmental information is what open government is about. More information: Read more about STRIPE here Read an article about STRIPE from TechPresident.com

Attacking Transparency

By Megan Daley (Posted: October 10, 2013)

Though it is widely accepted that more transparency in our governments equates to more openness and fairness, some have begun to view Freedom of Information laws more as a tool for negative media coverage rather than increased transparency. Many who once advocated for laws that increase citizens’ access to information have realized that transparency not only opens the doors to information for citizens, but to criticism by the media. Indeed, some developing countries recently passing Freedom of Information laws find themselves being criticized for past mistakes now open to the media while little is mentioned of their more corrupt (and less transparent) neighboring governments. This consequence of transparency has been noted in the developed world as well. For instance, Tony Blair viewed his passing of the UK’s Freedom of Information Act as “imbecility”, stressing the use of Freedom of Information laws by the media rather than by the average citizen. Similarly, with the passage of FOIA, the ugliness of American politics has become even more transparent, resulting in the American public’s increased disdain for Congress, Congressmen’s fear of making unpopular deals under a spotlight, and the stagnation of progress in the American political system. Thus, many American lawmakers advocate a return to the old, less transparent way of politics, “For a couple hundred years, we developed a process in this country.… It was not a smooth process; it was messy, it was partisan. But it fundamentally worked”.

But do we really think a return to less transparent, closed information governments is the right path? Though opening governments to harsher criticisms from the watchful eye of the media, Freedom of Information Laws have also created a more educated and informed public. More so than ever before, citizens possess the information to make truly informed decisions that bequeath them the ability to change their governments accordingly. Lawmakers may dislike the watchfulness and increased scrutiny that accompanies Freedom of Information laws, but this problem is more reflective of the jaded perception the media has of lawmakers, a problem that far precedes the passing of access to information laws. Unintentionally, through their criticism of transparency and openness, leaders and other politicians are only strengthening the support of corrupt, tyrannical governments – governments that result from a lack of transparency and that, when given the choice, no citizen or lawmaker of a transparent government would prefer.

http://blogs.worldbank.org/publicsphere/open-governments-doe…

http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/washington-s-bad-old…

Open Government Partnership Annual Summit

By Megan Daley (Posted: October 9, 2013)

The Open Government Partnership (OGP) Summit will be held in London October 30 – November 1. OGP was created 2 years ago and strives to encourage transparency throughout the world through government reform. Representatives from civil society organization, businesses, and governments will meet to discuss the successes, issues, and future agenda of OGP. The London summit will also serve to welcome new countries, announce new themes, new multilateral partnerships, and a prize competition. Among the policy issues to be discussed:

•Open data: opening up government data to boost entrepreneurship, growth and accountability •Government integrity: fighting corruption and strengthening democracy through transparent government •Fiscal transparency: ensuring taxpayers can follow public money •Empowering citizens: improving the relationship between citizens and governments •Natural resource transparency: ensuring natural resources are used for public benefit

This summit aims to encourage representatives to share their experience with each other in an effort to energize transparency efforts worldwide. Objectives include encouraging a more interactive and participatory civil society, motivating transparency advocates around the world, and translating ideas into actions while tracking its progress.

More information can be found at: http://www.opengovpartnership.org/get-involved/london-summit…

Quince países de América Latina preparan convención internacional por derechos ambientales

By FIMA (Posted: September 26, 2013)

Entre los gobiernos presentes en la instancia se cuentan Brasil, Argentina, Colombia, México y Chile, los cuales están negociando una Convención Internacional sobre ‘democracia ambiental’, para aplicar el Principio 10 de la Convención de Río, y fijar así una base institucional, administrativa y política sobre tres pilares: acceso a información, participación ciudadana y derecho a Justicia en materia medioambiental. El Gobierno chileno preside actualmente el proceso, que se encuentra en fase de negociación técnica. Esta es llevada a cabo por 40 profesionales de los ministerios: de Medioambiente, de Relaciones Exteriores, de Desarrollo Social, y de la Secretaría General de la Presidencia.

América Latina no tiene plataformas de información ambiental de alcance continental, para saber, por ejemplo, de la transferencia de contaminantes entre países, derivada de actividades extractivas o productivas como la minería, la generación termoeléctrica, los transgénicos, o la situación del suelo, el aire y el agua. Tampoco existe estándar básico de participación ciudadana en las decisiones políticas y productivas, y menos todavía una base sobre acceso a Justicia para exigir derechos ambientales.

Con ese vacío en mente, 15 países de América Latina buscan crear una institucionalidad continental, a fin de operacionalizar el Principio 10 de la Convención de Río. Además del trabajo continuo que se hace a través de teleconferencias, ya se han realizado dos reuniones internacional en noviembre de 2012 en Santiago y en abril de este año en México, donde se fijó la hoja de ruta. La próxima es a fines de octubre o comienzos de noviembre en un país aún por definir.

Al amparo de Naciones Unidas, la Unión Europea ya creó en 1999 la llamada “Convención de Aarhus” sobre derecho a información, participación ciudadana y acceso a justicia, considerado el instrumento más avanzado sobre ‘democracia ambiental’, y firmado ya por 46 países. Pese a ello, la abogada y negociadora del Ministerio de Medioambiente, Constance Nalegach, aduce que se optó por crear una institucionalidad nueva, porque en América Latina los recursos naturales son más necesarios para la economía en comparación con Europa:

“Si bien la Convención de Aarhus está abierta a todos los países del mundo, nosotros como América Latina y El Caribe también enfrentamos desafíos que son particulares a nuestra región. El uso de los recursos naturales en nuestra región es una base de la economía, lo que no es tan fuerte en Europa. En nuestra región ya hay ciertos indicios sobre todo de temas de conflictos de interés e incluso de conflictos ambientales por el uso de los recursos naturales”, adujo la funcionaria.

Por su parte, el director de Medio Ambiente del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Waldemar Coutts, informa los temas que propuso Chile en esta instancia internacional:

“Llegamos con dos temas a la conferencia de Río + 20 del llamado ‘Principio 10’ que abarca estos tres pilares, y también la importancia que reviste la Responsabilidad Social Empresarial (RSE) en la consecución del desarrollo sustentable, y que se refleja en el documento final de la conferencia, denominado “El futuro que queremos”, y eso quedó reflejado en dos párrafos, el 46 sobre la importancia de la RSE y el 47 referida a la importancia de que las empresas, tanto del Estado como las privadas que cotizan en la bolsa, generen informes de sustentabilidad”, acotó el funcionario de Cancillería.

En representación de la sociedad civil actúa la “Iniciativa Acceso”, que incorpora una organización no gubernamental (ONG) por cada país. Chile es representado por la Fiscalía del Medio Ambiente (FIMA), una de las de mayor tradición en la defensa de derechos ambientales. Su director ejecutivo, Ezio Costa, resalta el papel del Gobierno para revertir el vacío institucional ambiental en América Latina.

“No hay nada a nivel latinoamericano, por eso es importante tener una convención como esta, que permita tener ciertas lógicas comunes, que a la larga lleven a algún nivel de gestión común, pues los recursos naturales, el medioambiente y los ecosistemas son recursos comunes que traspasan las fronteras, de tal manera que esas políticas consideren la existencia de estos derechos reconocidos internacionalmente y el acuerdo y la voluntad de los Estados de América Latina de hacerlos cumplir, y de respetar sus obligaciones internacionales. Hasta ahora ha sido un proceso que en el caso de Chile ha tomado muy en cuenta a la sociedad civil organizada”, dijo el ambientalista.

*Nota de Helmuth Huerta Radio Universidad de Chile Ver nota completa de Radio Universidad de Chile http://radio.uchile.cl/2013/08/25/quince-paises-de-america-l…

RESULTS: Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC) and Europe Exchange: Moving Forward to a LAC Convention on P10 Workshop

By Megan Daley (Posted: September 9, 2013)

On July 30-31, The Access Initiative, in partnership with the Regional Environmental Center for Central and Easter Europe and the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and through Centro Ecuatoriano de Derecho Ambiental (CEDA), Iniciativa de Acceso Mexico (IA-Mex) and World Resources Institute (WRI), hosted the Latin American and the Caribbean (LAC) and Europe Exchange: Moving Forward to a LAC Convention on P10 workshop in Quito, Ecuador. Additionally, the meeting included partners from 19 different countries across the Americas and Europe. The main goal of the workshop was to exchange ideas between the European and TAI LAC partners.

The LAC Convention strives to contribute to good governance, democracy, and sustainable development. This will be achieved through establishing standards and procedures for access rights, preventing and reducing environmental conflicts, reducing poverty, protecting natural resources, and strengthening transparency. The Quito meeting yielded many results that correspond to these goals, including an Advocacy and Outreach Strategy (attached) that outlined key actions, responsibilities of the partners, and intended deadlines. Objectives of the strategy included increasing the number of Caribbean signatories of the P10 Declaration, gaining more political support, and increasing the number of participants registered for the LAC Process. One of the most important goals to emerge, however, was the advocacy for the creation of a process for legally binding conventions with governments by 2014. If achieved, this objective will increase legitimacy, cooperation, and government support for TAI partners and the LAC Process. Finally, it was agreed upon that TAI partners would utilize social media more to update others on the LAC Process, inform their various networks on progress, and distribute information on the process at regional meetings.

Overall, the Quito Workshop included interactive engagement and dialogue amongst partners that led to ambitious objectives. The exchange of ideas will greatly benefit TAI’s future goals and tactics in the LAC Process.